AUTHOR: Lee-Anne Oliver
BVM&S CertAVP(cattle)(sheep) MRCVS

Founder & CEO

The Green Revolution transformed agriculture in the mid-20th Century, delivering remarkable yield increases through the application of fertilisers and intensification. Yet this approach has reached a crossroads. As a farm vet, I’ve witnessed firsthand how our profession has evolved from supporting this intensive model to embracing something fundamentally different. This shift is particularly evident in regenerative livestock farming, where prevention, system design and ecological awareness are key.

From Props to Partners

Traditional intensive systems created conditions far removed from the natural environment of livestock. The veterinary response became predictable – when high stocking densities led to coccidiosis outbreaks, we medicated feed. When respiratory diseases struck overcrowded sheds, we prescribed vaccines and antibiotics. We became skilled at propping up systems rather than questioning whether those systems were sustainable.

This approach worked temporarily. But it created dependencies that are no longer viable. Over-reliance on treatments has driven renewed interest in livestock farming without pharmaceuticals, especially among farmers seeking sustainable beef production methods.

Antimicrobial resistance is widespread, while helminth resistance often follows routine chemical worming, and consumers are increasingly rejecting food produced with pharmaceutical interventions. Supply chains for veterinary medicines have become unreliable, and environmental damage from chemical usage disrupts beneficial pasture ecosystems.

A Different Path Forward

Progressive vets are discovering that livestock possess a phenomenal ability to resist disease when conditions support their natural defences. I’ve seen cattle finishers buy stock from multiple sources through markets – animals carrying various respiratory viruses – yet experience minimal disease and low antibiotic usage. Their success comes from low-stress systems, proper ventilation, balanced nutrition, and batch management.

Compare this to farms that implement comprehensive vaccination programmes yet still battle high bovine respiratory disease incidence. The difference lies in addressing root causes rather than symptoms.

On progressive farms, vets are leading proactive health programmes, with 80-85% of work devoted to herd health management rather than treating sick animals. This veterinary-led, preventative approach has improved both animal welfare and sustainability.

The Evidence for Change

The data supports this transformation. Sales of antibiotics for UK farm animals fell by 55% between 2014 and 2022, reaching the lowest levels on record. This wasn’t achieved through regulation alone, but through vet-led stewardship, which emphasised improved biosecurity, vaccination strategies, and herd health planning.

Disease eradication programmes demonstrate what’s possible. Scotland’s BVD eradication programme, supported by vets since 2010, reduced BVD-positive herds from approximately 30% to 7.3%, delivering an estimated £35-£55 per cow annually in saved losses. Crucially, these programmes succeeded through practical interventions: better colostrum management, improved housing design, and enhanced biosecurity, not just pharmaceutical solutions.

 

Practical Transformation

Simple changes yield profound results. Calves receiving adequate colostrum within two hours of birth show a lower incidence of BVD-related complications and general illness. Housing improvements that prevent nose-to-nose contact drastically reduce disease transmission. These aren’t high-tech solutions; they’re fundamental veterinary principles applied thoughtfully and effectively.

This represents more than technical change, it’s about professional identity. Our veterinary oath compels us to put animal welfare first and provide impartial advice. When we remain independent from commercial interests, we can focus entirely on what serves animals and farmers best.

Economic Reality

Some suggest that vets pursuing regenerative approaches are “working themselves out of a job.” The evidence suggests otherwise. Vets help secure £14.8 billion in annual UK livestock output – a value that cannot be realised without veterinary input. But our contribution is shifting from reactive treatment to proactive system design.

The components of livestock systems are interdependent. One improvement often benefits multiple aspects of production. When we help farmers implement rotational grazing, improve genetics for environmental adaptation, or design housing that supports natural behaviours, we’re building resilience that reduces long-term veterinary intervention needs whilst improving profitability. These steps also contribute to carbon sequestration in livestock farming, reinforcing the broader environmental role of veterinary input.

The Future Role

Regenerative agriculture doesn’t diminish the importance of veterinary work; it elevates it. We become partners in system transformation, applying scientific knowledge of pathogens and parasites to promote healthy immune systems rather than suppress disease symptoms.

This evolution requires veterinary professionals who understand both traditional pathology and ecological principles. We need to observe carefully, think systemically, and communicate effectively with farmers navigating complex transitions.

The livestock industry needs veterinary expertise more than ever, but applied differently. Instead of maintaining unsustainable systems, we can help design farms that produce safe food whilst enhancing environmental stewardship and meeting consumer expectations.

Our profession’s future lies not in perpetuating dependency, but in building agricultural systems robust enough to thrive with minimal intervention. That’s not working ourselves out of jobs, it’s working towards the future that agriculture desperately needs.

 

Sources:

British Veterinary Association (BVA). (2021). Submission to the House of Lords EU Committee. Available at: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/8458/pdf

Gilbert, W., Thomas, L. F., Coyne, L., & Rushton, J. (2021). Mitigating the risks posed by intensification in livestock production: the examples of antimicrobial resistance and zoonoses. Animal, 15(2), 100123. Available at: https://www.nuffieldscholar.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/Grace%20O’%20Gorman%20.pdf

Vet Times. (2023). Bovine viral diarrhoea: UK’s quest for disease eradication CPDBVD. Available at: https://www.vettimes.com/clinical/livestock/bovine-viral-diarrhoea-uks-quest-for-disease-eradication-cpdbvd

Veterinary Medicines Directorate. (2022). UK VARSS Report: Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance and Sales Surveillance 2022. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/veterinary-antimicrobial-resistance-and-sales-surveillance-2022

Veterinary Medicines Directorate. (2022). VARSS Highlights 2021. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63a41fc1d3bf7f375c7d832b/TP_FINAL_VARSS_Highlights_2021_2022_41102022-accessible.pdf